USPTO serial 78832279
BUG WHEELS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MILTON, PRISCILLA
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BUG WHEELS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Signal Hill, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kevin P. Steinman
KEVIN P STEINMAN435 S DETROIT ST STE 304LOS ANGELES, CA 90036UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | Bath toys; Battery operated action toys; Bendable toys; Cases for toy structures; Cases for toy vehicles; Children's multiple activity toys; Clockwork toys; Clockwork toys; Collectable toy figures; Construction toys; Disc toss toys; Drawing toys; Electric action toys; Electronically operated toy motor vehicles; Fantasy character toys; Flying saucers; Lever action toys; Mechanical action toys; Mechanical toys; Modeled plastic toy figurines; Molded toy figures; Musical toys; Non-riding transportation toys; Plastic character toys; Plush toys; Pop up toys; Positionable toy figures; Pull toys; Push toys; Radio controlled toy vehicles; Ride-on toys; Rubber character toys; Soft sculpture plush toys; Soft sculpture toys; Squeeze toys; Talking toys; Tossing disc toys; Toy action figures and accessories therefor; Toy airplanes; Toy animals and accessories therefore; Toy banks; Toy boxes; Toy building blocks; Toy building blocks capable of interconnection; Toy clocks and watches; Toy construction blocks; Toy construction sets; Toy figures; Toy furniture; Toy gliders; Toy model cars; Toy model hobbycraft kits; Toy model kit cars; Toy model train sets; Toy model vehicles and related accessories sold as units; Toy record players; Toy robots; Toy rockets; Toy scooters; Toy trains and parts and accessories therefor; Toy vehicles and accessories therefor; Toy vehicles with transforming parts; Toy watches; Toy weapons; Toy, namely, battery-powered computer game with LCD screen which features animation and sound effects; Transforming robotic toy vehicles; Transforming robotic toys; Water squirting toys; Wind-up toys; Wind-up walking toys | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 7, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 5, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 26, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 26, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 26, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 26, 2007 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Nov 24, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 16, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 16, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 16, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 16, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 7, 2007 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 7, 2007 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| May 7, 2007 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 7, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 1, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 1, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 1, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 1, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 29, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 15, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |