Drawing for FIRE-HORSE

USPTO serial 78832611

FIRE-HORSE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
JOINER, KATINA JACKSON
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with FIRE-HORSE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael R. Diliberto

MICHAEL R DILIBERTO KLEINBERG & LERNER LLP2049 CENTURY PARK E STE 1080LOS ANGELES, CA 90067UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
020Interior design decorative elements, including, wall hangings; metal, ceramic and wood statues and display art; decorative fabrics, including furniture slipcovers and pillows; decorative bowls, baskets, vases and frames; and decorative glass, ceramic and mosaic tile accentsACTIVE—
021Interior design decorative elements, including, metal, ceramic, wooden, and glass housewares, statues and display art; decorative bowls, baskets, vases and frames; and decorative glass, ceramic and mosaic tile accentsACTIVE—
025ClothingACTIVE—
028Toys and sporting goodsACTIVE—
041Production and distribution of audiovisual entertainment and informational content for theatrical, homevideo, television, TV, video-on-demand, worldwide web, and mobile content platformsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 23, 2007MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 23, 2007ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 25, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 25, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 24, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 16, 2006MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Mar 15, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance