USPTO serial 78832938
MIAMI FC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BUONGIORNO, CHRISTOPHER L
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MIAMI FC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lance D. Reich
Nancy J. Flint Carlton Fields450 S. Orange Ave.Attn: Jill Sarnoff RiolaOrlando, FL 32801Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Printed matter, namely, posters, stickers, and souvenir soccer game programs | ACTIVE | Dec 3, 2005 |
| 025 | Soccer-related wearing apparel, namely, T-shirts, jackets, sweatshirts, hats, sweaters | ACTIVE | Dec 3, 2005 |
| 041 | Entertainment in the nature of organizing, conducting and staging professional soccer games and exhibitions; providing a website featuring soccer and soccer-related information | ACTIVE | Dec 3, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 21, 2009 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 21, 2009 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Jul 21, 2009 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| May 4, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 17, 2008 | GEA2 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION GRANTING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2008 | GECG | ACTION GRANTING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2008 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 5, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 5, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 3, 2008 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 3, 2008 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 3, 2008 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 3, 2008 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 1, 2008 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| May 1, 2008 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 1, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 29, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 29, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 27, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 27, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 6, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 6, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 6, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 5, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 28, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 28, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 27, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 15, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |