USPTO serial 78833514
ORANGE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 23, 2013
- Examiner
- SOUDERS, MICHAEL J
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with ORANGE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Syracuse, NY, US
Syracuse, NY, US
Syracuse, NY, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Melinda M. Lothes
Melinda M. Lothes Syracuse University900 South Crouse Avenue, Suite 518Office of University CounselSyracuse, NY 13244Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | caps; T-shirts; shorts; sweatshirts; knitted hats; cotton tops; fleece sweatshirts and pants; jackets; boxer shorts; wind resistant jacket shells; neckties; * toddler sweatshirts; infant and toddler T-shirts; infant [ and toddler ] rompers; toddler socks; * [ visors; infant and toddler sport shirts, sweatshirts, sweatpants, bib overalls, T-shirts, shorts, cloth diaper pants, rompers, tank shirts, and socks; belts; aprons; ] cloth [ and plastic ] baby bibs; [ suspenders; headbands; ] children's warm-up suits; [ wristbands; ] headwear; [ gloves; ] [ sneakers; ] [ earmuffs; ] athletic jerseys; [ athletic shoes; ] [ runners' safety vests; rugby shirts; ] [ sweaters; ] scarves; [ nightgowns; ] socks; [ and footies; ] [ booties; ] polo shirts; [ vinyl ponchos; ] [ leather athletic footwear; ] [ leather jackets, ] all for promoting activities of, showing support for, and/or showing affiliation with a University, its students, alumni and athletic teams | ACTIVE | Oct 25, 1988 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 14, 2026 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Oct 20, 2023 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2023 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Oct 20, 2023 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Oct 20, 2023 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 24, 2023 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 23, 2022 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| May 14, 2019 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 14, 2019 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| May 13, 2019 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| May 12, 2019 | PR23 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15 | — |
| May 12, 2019 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 22, 2019 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 3, 2018 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 3, 2018 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 23, 2018 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| May 27, 2013 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 27, 2013 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 23, 2013 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 15, 2013 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Mar 15, 2013 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 15, 2013 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 24, 2012 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 24, 2012 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 14, 2011 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 11, 2011 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 11, 2011 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 11, 2011 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 11, 2011 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 14, 2010 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 18, 2010 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 17, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 17, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 10, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 8, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 8, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 8, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 8, 2010 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 8, 2010 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2010 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 8, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 10, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 10, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 10, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 12, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 12, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 12, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 22, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 20, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 20, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 20, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 16, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 16, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 28, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 28, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 26, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 26, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 18, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 16, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 16, 2007 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 16, 2007 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 15, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 15, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 9, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 20, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 20, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 20, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 15, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |