USPTO serial 78833783
SAN JOSE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SISUN, SCOTT
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SAN JOSE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James Y. Becker
JAMES Y BECKER HAYNSWORTH SINKLER BOYD PA1201 MAIN ST 22ND FLCOLUMBIA, SC 29201UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Baked beans; Bean dip; Chile rellenos; Chili ; Dairy-based beverages; Dips ; Fruit and vegetable salads; Garden salads; Guacamole; Processed beans; Refried beans; Snack dips ; Vegetable salads; Preparedentrees consisting primarily of meat, fish, poultry or vegetables | ACTIVE | Dec 31, 1980 |
| 030 | Bakery desserts; Beverages made of coffee; Beverages made of tea; Burritos; Chalupas; Cheese sauce; Enchiladas; Fajitas; Salad dressings; Salad sauces; Taco chips; Taco seasoning; Taco shells; Tacos; Tortilla chips; Tortilla shells; Tortillas; Preparedentrees consisting primarily of pasta or rice | ACTIVE | Dec 31, 1980 |
| 032 | Brewed malt-based alcoholic beverage in the nature of a beer; Fruit beverages; Fruit-flavored beverages; Non-alcoholic beverages containing fruit juices; Non-alcoholic beverages, namely, carbonated beverages | ACTIVE | Dec 31, 1980 |
| 043 | Carry-out restaurants; Fast-food restaurants; Preparation of food and beverages; Restaurant and bar services; Restaurant services; Restaurants; Serving of food and drink/beverages; Take-out restaurant services | ACTIVE | Dec 31, 1980 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by San Jose Restaurante Mexicano #3, Inc. (d/b/a Eric's San Jose)
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Other trademarks in Class 043
- Similar marks named SAN JOSE
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 29, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 29, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 28, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 28, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 25, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 15, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |