USPTO serial 78834354
V10
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3557581Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 6, 2009
- Examiner
- DELGIZZI, RONALD ERNEST
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with V10?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Boerner Kunststoff und Metallwarenfabrik GmbH
Landscheid-Niederkail, DE
Other trademarks owned by Boerner Kunststoff und Metallwarenfabrik GmbH
Boerner Kunststoff und Metallwarenfabrik GmbH
Landscheid-Niederkail, DE
Other trademarks owned by Boerner Kunststoff und Metallwarenfabrik GmbH
Boerner Kunststoff und Metallwarenfabrik GmbH
Landscheid-Niederkail, DE
Other trademarks owned by Boerner Kunststoff und Metallwarenfabrik GmbH
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Christopher M. Brock
CHRISTOPHER M BROCK HARNESS, DICKEY & PIERCE PLC5445 CORPORATE DR STE 400TROY, MI 48098UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | Small hand-operated household and kitchen utensils, namely, food cutters, slicers, non-electric fruit and vegetable peelers, choppers, vegetable shredders, knife blade guards, nut crackers, knives, spoons, forks; wall-mounted holders for the aforesaid kitchen and household items | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 021 | Small hand-operated household and kitchen utensils, namely, graters, noodle presses, garlic presses; food and jar grippers, barbecue grippers, pepper mills, manual juice squeezers; containers for household or kitchen use not made of precious metal, namely, food containers, juice containers; beverage glassware for household and kitchen use; mugs, plates and dinnerware of porcelain for household and kitchen use; mugs, plates and dinnerware of stoneware for household and kitchen use; wall-mounted holders for the aforesaid kitchen and household items | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Boerner Kunststoff und Metallwarenfabrik GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Boerner Kunststoff und Metallwarenfabrik GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Boerner Kunststoff und Metallwarenfabrik GmbH
- Other trademarks in Class 008
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Similar marks named V10
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 7, 2015 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jan 6, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 21, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 1, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 18, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 17, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 12, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 12, 2008 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 12, 2008 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 12, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 11, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 14, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 14, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 14, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 14, 2008 | ADBS | 1(B) BASIS DELETED; NEW BASIS REQUESTED | — |
| Aug 14, 2008 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Aug 14, 2008 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Aug 14, 2008 | ATRQ | ATTORNEY REVIEW/DECISION ON AMENDMENT REQUIRED | — |
| Aug 14, 2008 | PCBG | PETITION TO DIRECTOR - CHANGE BASIS - GRANTED | — |
| Aug 13, 2008 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Aug 7, 2008 | PDCB | PETITION TO DIRECTOR - CHANGE BASIS - RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 7, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 4, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 4, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 4, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 5, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 13, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 24, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 10, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 10, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 10, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 7, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 31, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 31, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 31, 2007 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 31, 2007 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 31, 2007 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Mar 2, 2007 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 2, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 28, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 27, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 27, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 28, 2006 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Aug 28, 2006 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Aug 28, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 15, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |