USPTO serial 78834747
RUMBLE REFINISH PRODUCTS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- THOMAS, JANICE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with RUMBLE REFINISH PRODUCTS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Milton, Ontario L9T 3Y, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Danielle I. Mattessich
DANIELLE I MATTESSICH MERCHANT & GOULD80 S 8TH STPO BOX 2910MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Rust inhibitors; performance chemicals, namely, fuel injection cleaners; adhesives and adhesive primers for general bonding and repair for automobiles; automobile brake system and power steering system leak sealants | ACTIVE | — |
| 002 | Automotive paints and coatings; anticorrosive paints and vehicle corrosion inhibitor preparations; undercoating for vehicle chassis and undercoating for surfaces to be painted | ACTIVE | — |
| 003 | Cleaning preparations and solvents for automotive engines and batteries; glass cleaning preparations | ACTIVE | — |
| 006 | Steel wire | ACTIVE | — |
| 007 | Electric knives; power tools, namely, moulding removal tools | ACTIVE | — |
| 008 | Hand tools, namely, knives, moulding removal tools, adhesive and sealant dispenser | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Electric cord | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | Waterproof cloth tape | ACTIVE | — |
| 017 | Grout sealants, pipe joint sealant and caulking compounds; adhesive tape for industrial and commercial use, electrical insulation tape; insulation tape for use with automobiles | ACTIVE | — |
| 022 | Shock cords not of metal | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Pro Form Products Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 002
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 008
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 017
- Other trademarks in Class 022
- Similar marks named RUMBLE REFINISH PRODUCTS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 12, 2008 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Mar 12, 2008 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2008 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 11, 2007 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2007 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 11, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 23, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 22, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 22, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 24, 2007 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Feb 24, 2007 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Feb 24, 2007 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Feb 24, 2007 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jan 19, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 19, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 19, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 19, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 11, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 11, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 15, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 16, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |