USPTO serial 78835091
MAKE DECISIONS, IMPLEMENT DECISIONS, INFORMATION GATHERING, INTERNAL COMMUNICATIONS, ANALYSIS/DECISION MAKING, PLANNING/GOAL SETTING, IMPLEMENTATION/EXECUTION, FEEDBACK/CONTROL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WHITNEY, MEGAN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MAKE DECISIONS, IMPLEMENT DECISIONS, INFORMATION GATHERING, INTERNAL COMMUNICATIONS, ANALYSIS/DECISION MAKING, PLANNING/GOAL SETTING, IMPLEMENTATION/EXECUTION, FEEDBACK/CONTROL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Russikon, CH
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Business consultation; Business consultation services; Business consultation services to assist non-profit organizations in planning, managing, and conducting fundraising activities via a global computer network; Business consulting and business information for enterprises; Business consulting and information services; Business consulting services relating to product distribution, operations management services, logistics, reverse logistics, supply chain, and production systems and distribution solutions; Business consulting, inquiries or information; Business consulting, management, planning and supervision; Business management and consultation; Business management consultancy and advisory services; Business management consultancy as well as development of processes for the analysis and the implementation of strategy plans and management projects; Business management consultancy services; business management consultation; Business management consultation in the field of executive and leadership development; Business management consulting and advisory services; Business management consulting with relation to strategy, marketing, production, personnel and retail sale matters; Business marketing consulting services; Business organization and management consulting services; Business organization and operation consultancy; Business organizational consultation; Consultancy of personnel recruitment; Consultancy services regarding business strategies; Consulting services in business organization and management; Human capital management outsourcing services; Human resources consultation; Human resources management; Serving as a human resources department for others | ACTIVE | Aug 2, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Humatica AG
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named MAKE DECISIONS, IMPLEMENT DECISIONS, INFORMATION GATHERING, INTERNAL COMMUNICATIONS, ANALYSIS/DECISION MAKING, PLANNING/GOAL SETTING, IMPLEMENTATION/EXECUTION, FEEDBACK/CONTROL
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 19, 2007 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Sep 19, 2007 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Sep 19, 2007 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2007 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2007 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 27, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 27, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 20, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 31, 2007 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 20, 2007 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Apr 23, 2007 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 23, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 23, 2007 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 19, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 19, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 28, 2006 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Nov 24, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 26, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 16, 2006 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 16, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 6, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 26, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 26, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 22, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 22, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 9, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 18, 2006 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |