USPTO serial 78836934
BD BY DESIGN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BUTLER, MIDGE
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BD BY DESIGN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Prestwich, Manchester, GB
Prestwich, Manchester, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Angelo Notaro
Angelo Notaro Notaro & Michalos PC100 Dutch Hill Road, Suite 110Orangeburg, NY 10962-2100UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Hats; Jackets; Pants; Scarves; Sweaters; T-shirts; Tops; Vests | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 30, 2008 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 30, 2008 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 30, 2008 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 30, 2008 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 16, 2007 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 6, 2007 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 22, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 2, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 23, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 19, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 17, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 17, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 17, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 9, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 30, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 30, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 30, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 20, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |