USPTO serial 78837634
OHANA WINERY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STERKIN, DAVID
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with OHANA WINERY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Paso Robles, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Barry Strike
Barry Strike Strike & Techel300 Elinor Ave.Mill Valley, CA 94941UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 033 | Wine | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 5, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 14, 2006 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Nov 14, 2006 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2006 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Nov 7, 2006 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 31, 2006 | LOAP | LETTER OF ABANDONMENT PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 31, 2006 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 18, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 17, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 4, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 2, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 2, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 2, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 31, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 31, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 31, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 21, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |