USPTO serial 78838013
LIFESTREAM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MICHELI, ANGELA M
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LIFESTREAM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Paul Smith
PAUL SMITH PAUL SMITH INTELLECTUAL PROP SMITHS IP1367 West BroadwaySUITE 400Vancouver, B.C., V6H4A7Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | fruits and vegetables preserved, deep-frozen, dried, boiled or prepared for immediate consumption; soups; milk; cheese; yogurt; jams, marmalades, fruit sauces, fruit jellies and vegetable jellies; vegetable extracts; processed herbs; vegetarian patties; frozen, prepared or packaged vegetarian entrees consisting primarily of vegetables; potato chips; potato crisps; nut butters; grain and vegetable based meat substitutes; vegetable-based meat substitutes; cooking oils, culinary oils; edible oils and fats including margarine; tahini; processed edible seeds, namely flax seeds; fruit and/or nut based food bars. | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | (sections 1a and 44) pasta, waffles; (sections 1b and 44) processed cereals; breakfast cereals; flour; granola; muesli; oatmeal; hot oatmeal mixes; bread; bagels; biscuits; cakes; cookies; muffins; pastries; toaster pastries; confectionery, namely hard and soft candy, candy bars, chocolate bars, confectionery chips for baking; pancake mixes; waffle mixes; snack mixes consisting primarily of cereals, crackers, pretzels, candied nuts and/or popped corn; baking mixes, namely cake mixes, brownie mixes, cookie mixes; salt; sea salt; rice; crackers; crispbread; cereal-derived ready to eat food bars; granola-based food bars; honey; yeast; mustard; vinegar; sauces and spices; pasta sauces; condiments; grain-based energy food bars also containing dried fruits and/or nuts; grain-based food beverages; granola-based snack bars; fruit-filled pastries; fruit pies; rice cakes; pasta snacks, namely pieces of cooked and seasoned pasta; flax seed meal; herbal teas; snacks, namely corn chips. | ACTIVE | Sep 1, 2005 |
| 032 | fruit drinks and fruit juices | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 25, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 25, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 16, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 16, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 14, 2007 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2007 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 14, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 14, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 9, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 8, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 8, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 8, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 14, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 13, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 13, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 2, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 2, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 30, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 22, 2006 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |