USPTO serial 78840173
CLEAN & GREEN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SHIH, SALLY
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CLEAN & GREEN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Regina M. Corrigan
REGINA M CORRIGAN GOWLING LAFLEUR HEND CALGARY; ABC ALBERTAT2P 4V5700 2ND ST SW,Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | BATTERIES; BATTERY RELATED PRODUCTS, NAMELY, BATTERY CHARGERS, BATTERY ADDITIVES, BATTERY TERMINALS, BATTERY CONNECTORS; BATTERY CABLES, BATTERY ACID, BATTERY BOXES, BATTERY TRAYS, BATTERY RACKS, BATTERY STORAGE SYSTEMS, BATTERY CARRIERS, AND BATTERY TESTERS; ELECTRIC POWER SUPPLIES, NAMELY, UNINTERRUPTIBLE POWER SUPPLIES AND DIRECT CURRENT ON LINE AND OFF LINE POWER SUPPLIES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 3, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 3, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 25, 2007 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 25, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 16, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 16, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 6, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 19, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 11, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 11, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 9, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 9, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 7, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 22, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |