USPTO serial 78841011
MISL FLASH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SINGLETON, RUDY
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MISL FLASH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Charles P. Bacall
CHARLES P BACALL VERRILL DANA LLPPO BOX 586PORTLAND, ME 04112-0586UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Semi-conductor products, namely, memory storage devices and computer hardware devices supporting memory storage devices | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Design services for others in the field of integrated circuit design and integrated circuit engineering, hardware and software data networking, telecommunications and semiconductor memory applications | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 12, 2009 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Feb 12, 2009 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2009 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 15, 2008 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 14, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 21, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 20, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 19, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 22, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 22, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 14, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 10, 2007 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 7, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 15, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 13, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 11, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 10, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 7, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 7, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 7, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 5, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 11, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 8, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 5, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 24, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |