Drawing for VBV

USPTO serial 78841151

VBV

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SONNEBORN, TRICIA L
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VBV?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Denise Yee

900 Metro Center BoulevardM1-11AFoster City, CA 94404

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009computer hardware; computer peripherals; magnetic coded cards; electronically coded credit and debit cards; magnetic coded card readers; electronically coded card readers; magnetic coded banking cards using magnetic memories and integrated circuit memories; point of transaction terminals; data processors for financial applications; computer software for transmitting, displaying and storing transaction, identification and financial information for use in the financial services, banking and telecommunications industries; computer software for encrypting data and electronic communications; computer software for implementing encryption, authentication, access control and other security features for computer networks and networked servers; computer software for use in database management and risk management; computer operating systems; computer utility programs; network management programs; computer programs for managing, viewing and editing files, documents, electronic mail messages and private network and global computer network communications; electronic access and wireless communication devices, namely personal digital assistants, set top boxes, mobile phones, point of sale devices, and computers; and user manuals sold together with all of the foregoingACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 29, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 29, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 22, 2008EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
May 12, 2008EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
May 12, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 13, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Nov 26, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 26, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 29, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 6, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 14, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 12, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 11, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 6, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 6, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 6, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 4, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 14, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 14, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 14, 2006ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jun 14, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 14, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 24, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance