Drawing for GMX HIGH PERFORMANCE BUILDING SYSTEMS

USPTO serial 78841301

GMX HIGH PERFORMANCE BUILDING SYSTEMS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LAWRENCE, SUSAN KASTRINER
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - DOCKET CLERK

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GMX HIGH PERFORMANCE BUILDING SYSTEMS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Brian E. Turung

BRIAN E TURUNG FAY SHARPE FAGAN MINNICH & MCKEE LLP1100 SUPERIOR AVE E FL 7CLEVELAND, OH 44114-2531UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
002Waterproofing materials, namely, non-metallic polymer coatings for side walls, flooring, foundations, and/or roofing; waterproofing materials, namely, non-metallic solvent-based or water-based sealer coatings used for waterproofing side walls, flooring, foundations, and/or roofing; waterproofing materials, namely, coatings in the nature of non-metallic masonry sealers for side walls, flooring, foundations, and/or roofing; waterproofing materials, namely, non-metallic concrete paints for side walls, flooring, foundations, and/or roofingACTIVEFeb 1, 2006
017Waterproofing non-metallic polymer membranes for foundations of buildings; insulating waterproofing non-metallic polymer membranesACTIVEFeb 1, 2006
019Waterproofing materials, namely non-metallic rubberized-base or asphalt-based cement for side walls, flooring, foundations, and/or roofing; non-metallic polymer roofing membranes; non-metal construction materials, namely, foundation drain and pipe systems consisting of sheet drains, strip drains, strip drain outlets, corner fittings, corner guards, tee connectors, drain splices, drain pipes; construction materials, namely, nonmetal foundation drainage boards and nonmetal foundation protection boardsACTIVEFeb 1, 2006
024Non-woven fiber glass board or polyester reinforcement fabric for side walls, flooring, foundations, and/or roofingACTIVEFeb 1, 2006

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 6, 2007MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Dec 6, 2007ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Dec 5, 2007EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
May 29, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 29, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 7, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
May 7, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 11, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 11, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 13, 2006GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 13, 2006CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Oct 26, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Oct 16, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 16, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 11, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 11, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 5, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 25, 2006AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Jul 25, 2006PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Mar 24, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance