USPTO serial 78841301
GMX HIGH PERFORMANCE BUILDING SYSTEMS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LAWRENCE, SUSAN KASTRINER
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - DOCKET CLERK
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GMX HIGH PERFORMANCE BUILDING SYSTEMS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Brian E. Turung
BRIAN E TURUNG FAY SHARPE FAGAN MINNICH & MCKEE LLP1100 SUPERIOR AVE E FL 7CLEVELAND, OH 44114-2531UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 002 | Waterproofing materials, namely, non-metallic polymer coatings for side walls, flooring, foundations, and/or roofing; waterproofing materials, namely, non-metallic solvent-based or water-based sealer coatings used for waterproofing side walls, flooring, foundations, and/or roofing; waterproofing materials, namely, coatings in the nature of non-metallic masonry sealers for side walls, flooring, foundations, and/or roofing; waterproofing materials, namely, non-metallic concrete paints for side walls, flooring, foundations, and/or roofing | ACTIVE | Feb 1, 2006 |
| 017 | Waterproofing non-metallic polymer membranes for foundations of buildings; insulating waterproofing non-metallic polymer membranes | ACTIVE | Feb 1, 2006 |
| 019 | Waterproofing materials, namely non-metallic rubberized-base or asphalt-based cement for side walls, flooring, foundations, and/or roofing; non-metallic polymer roofing membranes; non-metal construction materials, namely, foundation drain and pipe systems consisting of sheet drains, strip drains, strip drain outlets, corner fittings, corner guards, tee connectors, drain splices, drain pipes; construction materials, namely, nonmetal foundation drainage boards and nonmetal foundation protection boards | ACTIVE | Feb 1, 2006 |
| 024 | Non-woven fiber glass board or polyester reinforcement fabric for side walls, flooring, foundations, and/or roofing | ACTIVE | Feb 1, 2006 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by THE GARLAND COMPANY, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 002
- Other trademarks in Class 017
- Other trademarks in Class 019
- Other trademarks in Class 024
- Similar marks named GMX HIGH PERFORMANCE BUILDING SYSTEMS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 6, 2007 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Dec 6, 2007 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Dec 5, 2007 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| May 29, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 29, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 7, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 7, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 11, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 11, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 13, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 26, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 16, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 16, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 11, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 11, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 5, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 25, 2006 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Jul 25, 2006 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 24, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |