USPTO serial 78841471
DRY ZONE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 11, 2007
- Examiner
- LAWRENCE, SUSAN KASTRINER
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with DRY ZONE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $748*
Plus Government fees of $1,300
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
CLEVELAND, OH, US
CLEVELAND, OH, US
CLEVELAND, OH, US
CLEVELAND, OH, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Brian E. Turung
Brian E. Turung Ulmer & Berne LLP1660 West 2nd StreetSkylight Office Tower, Suite 1100Cleveland, OH 44113Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Documentation, namely, business records management with regard to roofing maintenance; database management in the field of roofing maintenance | ACTIVE | Feb 1, 2006 |
| 037 | Roofing evaluation, namely, roofing consultation services; roofing inspection, namely, building inspection with regard to roofs in the course of repair; roofing repair and maintenance; and construction management services with regard to roofing; providing a database featuring information regarding roofing maintenance | ACTIVE | Feb 1, 2006 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by GARLAND COMPANY, INC., THE
- Other trademarks owned by GARLAND COMPANY, INC., THE
- Other trademarks owned by GARLAND COMPANY, INC., THE
- Other trademarks owned by DESIGN-BUILD SOLUTIONS, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Similar marks named DRY ZONE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 6, 2026 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 11, 2026 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 22, 2020 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Nov 22, 2020 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 22, 2020 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Nov 22, 2020 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 22, 2020 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 22, 2020 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 22, 2017 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Oct 5, 2017 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 5, 2017 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Oct 5, 2017 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Oct 5, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 5, 2017 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 11, 2016 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2013 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2013 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Aug 28, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 12, 2013 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Aug 12, 2013 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 18, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 11, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 26, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 6, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 25, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 23, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 7, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 7, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 7, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 5, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 5, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 5, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 5, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 24, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |