USPTO serial 78842279
PURE GREEN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 27, 2009
- Examiner
- ORNDORFF, LINDA
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with PURE GREEN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Pure Green Lawn & Tree Professionals, Inc.
Lansing, MI
Other trademarks owned by Pure Green Lawn & Tree Professionals, Inc.
LANSING, MI
MISHAWAKA, IN
Pure Green Lawn & Tree Professionals, Inc.
Lansing, MI
Other trademarks owned by Pure Green Lawn & Tree Professionals, Inc.
Pure Green Lawn & Tree Professionals, Inc.
Lansing, MI
Other trademarks owned by Pure Green Lawn & Tree Professionals, Inc.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark J. Burzych
Mark J. Burzych Fahey Schultz Burzych Rhodes PLC4151 Okemos RoadOkemos, MI 48864UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | FERTILIZERS FOR AGRICULTURAL AND DOMESTIC USE, NAMELY, SOIL AMENDMENTS WHICH ARE INCORPORATED INTO OR ONTO TURF, LAWNS, BEDDINGS, AND OTHER NON-POTTED SOIL PROFILES | ACTIVE | Aug 1, 2009 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Pure Green Lawn & Tree Professionals, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by PURE GREEN FRANCHISING, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by EXPERIGREEN � DETROIT, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Pure Green Lawn & Tree Professionals, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Pure Green Lawn & Tree Professionals, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Similar marks named PURE GREEN
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 14, 2025 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Nov 8, 2018 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2018 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Nov 8, 2018 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Nov 8, 2018 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 31, 2018 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 11, 2017 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Dec 10, 2015 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - MAILED | — |
| Dec 10, 2015 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Dec 10, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 16, 2015 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 27, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 18, 2009 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 18, 2009 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 17, 2009 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 16, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 23, 2009 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 23, 2009 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Apr 2, 2009 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 2, 2009 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 2, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 10, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 10, 2008 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Oct 21, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 29, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 16, 2008 | UNDR | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - CORRESP. REMAILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 26, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 26, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 26, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 25, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 25, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 25, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 2, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 2, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 2, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 3, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 23, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 23, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 23, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 21, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 20, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 20, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 7, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 7, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 6, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 24, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |