Drawing for WEATHERGARD

USPTO serial 78842497

WEATHERGARD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CARROLL, DORITT
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WEATHERGARD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

G. Franklin Rothwell

G FRANKLIN ROTHWELL ROTHWELL, FIGG, ERNST & MANBECK PC1425 K ST NW STE 800WASHINGTON, DC 20005-3673UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025CLOTHING, NAMELY, WATERPROOF JACKETS AND PANTS, WIND RESISTANT JACKETS AND PANTS, AND RAINWEARACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 9, 2008MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Jul 9, 2008ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Jul 2, 2008EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jul 2, 2008EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jun 3, 2008LOAPLETTER OF ABANDONMENT PROCESSED—
May 29, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 26, 2007RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED—
Nov 26, 2007CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Nov 14, 2007EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Nov 14, 2007JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Oct 31, 2007EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Oct 26, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 30, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 28, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 10, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Apr 10, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 10, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 6, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 6, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 6, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 6, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 27, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance