Drawing for HUNTER'S PASSION

USPTO serial 78842544

HUNTER'S PASSION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
ROACH, APRIL K
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HUNTER'S PASSION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Natalya L. Rose

NATALYA L ROSE BONE MCALLESTER NORTON PLLC511 UNION ST STE 1600NASHVILLE, TN 37219-1780UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Clothing, namely, bathrobes, blouses, camisoles, coats, gowns, hosiery, jackets, jeans, jerseys, knit tops, lingerie, loungewear, nightgowns, pajamas, pants, rainwear, robes, shirts, shorts, skirts, sleep shirts, sleepwear, sweaters, sweatpants, sweatshirts, tank tops, tops, trousers, t-shirts, turtle-necks, vests and warm-up suitsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 11, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 19, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 17, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
May 8, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 13, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 24, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Dec 27, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Dec 27, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Dec 8, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Nov 18, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Nov 17, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 17, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 6, 2006GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Sep 6, 2006CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Aug 25, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 27, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance