Drawing for STRENGTH IN NUMBERS

USPTO serial 78842633

STRENGTH IN NUMBERS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SOMERVILLE, ARETHA CHARESE
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with STRENGTH IN NUMBERS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Erik J. Osterrieder

ERIK J OSTERRIEDER SCHUBERT OSTERRIEDER & NICKELSON PLLC6013 CANNON MTN DR S14AUSTIN, TX 77019UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036Financial consultation; Financial forecasting; Financial investment in the field of funds; Financial management; Financial planning; Financial planning consultation; Financial planning, namely the creation of personalized strategies to achieve financial independence; Financial portfolio management; Financial research; Financial services, namely assisting others with the completion of financial transactions for stocks, bonds, securities and equitiesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 10, 2008MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Dec 10, 2008ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Dec 9, 2008EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Jun 4, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 4, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 4, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 26, 2008RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Sep 21, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Mar 20, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Mar 20, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 5, 2006GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 5, 2006CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Sep 5, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 27, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance