USPTO serial 78842762
NETSTYLE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MACIOL II, EUGENE VALENTINE-JO
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NETSTYLE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Alan S. Cooper
ALAN S COOPER & HOWREY LLP HOWREY LLP1299 PENNSYLVANIA AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20004-2402UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | rotary converters, electrical phase modifiers; batteries and dry cells; electric wires and cables; electric flat irons, electric hair-curlers, electric buzzers; television receivers, television transmitters, radio receivers, radio transmitters, public-address systems and instruments, compact disc players, juke boxes, tape recorders, electric phonographs, record players, sound recording machines and apparatus, video cameras, videodisc players, videotape recorders, digital videodisc recorders, digital videodisc recorder incorporated with a hard-disc, portable videodisc players, portable and handheld digital memory recorders for recording, transmitting and reviewing text, data, and audio files; movie and data projectors, digital still cameras, digital movie cameras; personal computers, portable hard disc drives, home servers, namely, network controllers comprised of a hard disk drive and TV tuner for the purpose of wireless networking; computer servers; magnetic cores, resistance wires, electrodes. | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 26, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 26, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 21, 2009 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 20, 2009 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 5, 2009 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 5, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| May 20, 2009 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 20, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 4, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 4, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 4, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 24, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 1, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 12, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 28, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 26, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 6, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 4, 2008 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 4, 2008 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 4, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 4, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 4, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 31, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 10, 2007 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2007 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 9, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 9, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 23, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 4, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 2, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 2, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 27, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 27, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 25, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 27, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |