USPTO serial 78843399
THULE PRO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCBRIDE, THEODORE M
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with THULE PRO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Hillerstorp, SE
Hillerstorp, SE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Gregory V. Novak
GREGORY V NOVAK NOVAK DRUCE & QUIGG LLP1300 EYE ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20005-3314UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Eye bolts; metal goods, namely, ratchet tie downs for use with vehicles and vehicle rack systems, rollers for use with vehicles and vehicle rack systems, ladder quick secure clamp systems for use with vehicles and vehicle rack systems, metal clamps for use with ladders; conduit clamps and pipe clamps for use with vehicles and vehicle rack systems, tool boxes, and utility hooks for use with vehicles and vehicle rack systems | ACTIVE | — |
| 012 | Vehicle-mounted racks and cargo carriers for vehicles and accessories for and component parts thereof; van gutter rack systems for use with vehicles and vehicle rack systems; pickup truck racks and component parts and accessories therefor; load bars for vehicle and vehicle rack systems; vehicle attachment kits for use with vehicles and vehicle rack systems; cap rack systems for use with vehicles and vehicle rack systems; load stops; tilting load stops; ladder stops; ladder lift systems for use with vehicles and vehicle rack systems; ladder tilt systems for use with vehicles and vehicle rack systems; ladder holders for use with vehicles and vehicle rack systems; cab guards; conduit holders for use with vehicles and vehicle rack systems; truck bed dividers; automotive aftermarket parts, namely, truck bed tool storage boxes; light stands for use with vehicles and vehicle rack systems; bumper steps for use with vehicles and vehicle rack systems; wheel steps for use with vehicles and vehicle rack systems; baskets and canopies for use with vehicles and vehicle rack systems; cab cantilever vehicle rack extensions for use with vehicles and vehicle rack systems | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 15, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 15, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 17, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2010 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 14, 2010 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 30, 2009 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 30, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 14, 2009 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 14, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 14, 2009 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 14, 2009 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 14, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 22, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 2, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 17, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 16, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 13, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 12, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 11, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 11, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 11, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 11, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 11, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 10, 2007 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Nov 9, 2007 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Oct 27, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 26, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 29, 2007 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 25, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 21, 2007 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 21, 2007 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 21, 2007 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 21, 2007 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Mar 21, 2007 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 21, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 8, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 7, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 7, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 7, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 7, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 6, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 29, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |