USPTO serial 78843696
QUANTUM IDENTITY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CORWIN, CHARLOTTE K
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with QUANTUM IDENTITY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kathleen A. Pasulka
Kathleen A. Pasulka Procopio Cory Hargreaves & Savitch LLP530 B StreetSuite 2100San Diego, CA 92101Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for authentication of users on a computer network | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 21, 2008 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Oct 21, 2008 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Oct 21, 2008 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 21, 2008 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 21, 2008 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 18, 2007 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 28, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 8, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 22, 2007 | PBIC | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - INCOMING CORR RECEIVED | — |
| May 2, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 30, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 20, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 20, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 20, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 19, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 30, 2007 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jan 30, 2007 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 19, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 19, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 6, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 29, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |