USPTO serial 78843762
MANGA MIDRASH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 4, 2008
- Examiner
- GILBERT, REBECCA L
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with MANGA MIDRASH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lorraine Hirsch
LORRAINE HIRSCH LAW OFFICES OF LORRAINE HIRSCH17491 HICKS RDLOS GATOS, CA 95032-6632UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | A series of publications used in religious education, namely, comic books, textbooks, and graphic novels | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 8, 2006 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 10, 2014 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Mar 4, 2008 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 4, 2008 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jan 31, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 23, 2008 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 23, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 22, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 22, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 7, 2008 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 18, 2007 | PGTT | PETITION GRANTED - TTAB APPEAL FILED | — |
| Nov 19, 2007 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Nov 8, 2007 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 8, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 6, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 6, 2007 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 6, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 6, 2007 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| May 1, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 1, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 18, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 10, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 10, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 10, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 6, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 2, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 7, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 7, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 6, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 29, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |