USPTO serial 78845135
ACTION CUPS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 28, 2007
- Examiner
- LATTUCA, FRANK J
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with ACTION CUPS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joseph J. Ferretti
Jeanette S. Zimmer FRITO-LAY NORTH AMERICA, INC.7701 LEGACY DR3A-421Plano, TX 75024Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | POTATO CHIPS; POTATO CRISPS; POTATO-BASED SNACK FOODS; POTATO STICKS; PROCESSED NUTS; ROASTED NUTS; SHELLED NUTS; SNACK MIX CONSISTING PRIMARILY OF PROCESSED FRUITS, PROCESSED NUTS AND/OR RAISINS; PROCESSED EDIBLE SEEDS; ONION RINGS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 11, 2006 |
| 030 | CHEESE-FLAVORED PUFFED CORN SNACKS; CORN CHIPS; EXTRUDED CORN SNACKS; PUFFED CORN SNACKS; TORTILLA CHIPS; COOKIES; GRAIN-BASED CHIPS; CEREAL-BASED SNACK FOOD; WHEAT-BASED SNACK FOODS; EXTRUDED WHEAT SNACKS; FLOUR-BASED CHIPS; PRETZELS; SNACK MIX CONSISTING PRIMARILY OF CRACKERS, PRETZELS, CANDIED NUTS AND/OR POPPED POPCORN; SNACK MIX CONSISTING PRIMARILY OF TORTILLA CHIPS, PRETZELS, MULTIGRAIN SNACK CHIPS, CHEESE-FLAVORED PUFFED CORN SNACKS AND/OR CORN CHIPS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 11, 2006 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Frito-Lay North America, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Frito-Lay North America, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Frito-Lay North America, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named ACTION CUPS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 4, 2014 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Dec 7, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 28, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 12, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 23, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 12, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 12, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 21, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 20, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 19, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 19, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 19, 2006 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 19, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 19, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 18, 2006 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 8, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 17, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 17, 2006 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 29, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |