USPTO serial 78845500
MEDIALGLOO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MILLER, DAVID S
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MEDIALGLOO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JAMES F. GOSSETT
JAMES F GOSSETT ARNSTEIN & LEHR LLP120 S RIVERSIDE PLZ RM 1200CHICAGO, IL 60606-3910UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER SOFTWARE; PRERECORDED DIGITAL STORAGE MEDIA; PRERECORDED AUDIO, VIDEO AND MULTIMEDIA DATA | ACTIVE | Apr 1, 2006 |
| 035 | RETAIL STORE SERVICES FEATURING PRERECORDED DIGITAL STORAGE MEDIA, AND PRERECORDED AUDIO, VIDEO AND MULTIMEDIA DATA; ONLINE SALE OF PRERECORDED DIGITAL STORAGE MEDIA, AND PRERECORDED AUDIO, VIDEO AND MULTIMEDIA DATA; ON-LINE PUBLICATIONS AND DISCUSSION FORUMS FEATURING A WIDE VARIETY OF TOPICS INCLUDING AUDIO, VIDEO AND MULTIMEDIA ARTISTS AND TITLES | ACTIVE | Apr 1, 2006 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 6, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 6, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 8, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 8, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 8, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 29, 2006 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 2, 2006 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Jun 2, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 2, 2006 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 25, 2006 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Apr 25, 2006 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 11, 2006 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Mar 29, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |