USPTO serial 78845591
STREET LIFE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WELLS, CHRISTOPHER
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with STREET LIFE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Los Angeles, CA
Los Angeles, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
VICKI STEINER
Vicki Steiner, Esq.385 Charles Young Drive, East1106 Law BuildingLos Angeles, CA 90095-1458Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Sales promotion services for others in the field of musical recording and musical entertainment; and distributorship services in the field of musical recordings | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Entertainment services in the nature of record production; and providing information relating to music and entertainment via a global computer network | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 23, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 23, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 23, 2010 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 15, 2010 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 15, 2010 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 10, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 5, 2009 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 3, 2009 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 11, 2009 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 11, 2009 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 23, 2008 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 23, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 22, 2008 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Oct 22, 2008 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 22, 2008 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 17, 2008 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 28, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 24, 2008 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Mar 24, 2008 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 19, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 7, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 7, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 17, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 27, 2007 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Feb 27, 2007 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 23, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 3, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 5, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 5, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 4, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 4, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 29, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 7, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 7, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 7, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 2, 2006 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Oct 20, 2006 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Sep 23, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 22, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 13, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 8, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 19, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 19, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 29, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |