Drawing for CLOTHES SHOULD WORK

USPTO serial 78845600

CLOTHES SHOULD WORK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HAMMEL, LAURA A
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CLOTHES SHOULD WORK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Christopher M. Turk

CHRISTOPHER M TURK IMAGWEAR APPAREL CORP3411 SILVERSIDE RDWILMINGTON, DE 19810-4812UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Clothing, footwear and headgear, namely, Aprons, bandanas, belts, caps, pants, coats, coveralls, shirts, t-shirts, dresses, rainwear, gloves, hats, jackets, jeans, lab coats, mittens, overalls, parkas, scarves, shorts, skirts, smocks, socks, sweatsuits, sweaters, uniforms, visors, wind-resistant jackets, boots, shoes and slippersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 13, 2008MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Feb 12, 2008EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jan 16, 2008ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jan 16, 2008EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Nov 8, 2007EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Nov 8, 2007JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Nov 8, 2007EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
May 11, 2007GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 11, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 20, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 20, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 11, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 7, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 8, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 8, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 8, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 5, 2006CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Apr 5, 2006DMCCDATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED—
Apr 5, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 30, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 30, 2006PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Mar 29, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance