CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for BELIEVE IN THE ONE THAT BELIEVES IN YOU

USPTO serial 78846004

BELIEVE IN THE ONE THAT BELIEVES IN YOU

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
AIKENS, RONALD E
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BELIEVE IN THE ONE THAT BELIEVES IN YOU?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mark D. Miller

MARK D MILLER KIMBLE, MACMICHAEL & UPTON5260 N PALM AVE STE 221FRESNO, CA 93704-2210UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Bumper stickers; window decalsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 2, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 2, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 27, 2009EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Mar 27, 2009EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Mar 27, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 14, 2008DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Oct 7, 2008DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Oct 7, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 2, 2008EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Oct 2, 2008AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Oct 1, 2008EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Oct 1, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 11, 2008EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 10, 2008DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Apr 2, 2008EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Apr 2, 2008DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Apr 2, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 17, 2007UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Oct 2, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 10, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 20, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 5, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 31, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 30, 2007GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 30, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 20, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Apr 20, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 20, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 19, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 14, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 14, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 7, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 29, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance