USPTO serial 78846288
TIARA GIRL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FAIRBANKS, RONALD L
- Law office
- LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TIARA GIRL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Clothing for women and girls, namely, pants, denim jeans, overalls, shorts, shirts, blouses, skirts, dresses, gowns, sweaters, vests, T-shirts, sweatshirts, sweatpants, sleepwear, teddies, loungewear, robes, pajamas, night gowns, lingerie, camisoles, negligees, chemises, chemisettes, sarongs, bridal gowns and bridesmaid dresses | ACTIVE | Jan 31, 1990 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 25, 2007 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Sep 25, 2007 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Sep 24, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 24, 2007 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Aug 20, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 20, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 18, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 11, 2007 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2007 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2007 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 12, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 12, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 12, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 25, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 12, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 8, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 14, 2006 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 14, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 16, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 15, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 15, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 15, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 7, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 18, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 18, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 18, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 15, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 14, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 14, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 13, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 13, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 8, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 9, 2006 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Aug 9, 2006 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| May 22, 2006 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| May 22, 2006 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| May 22, 2006 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| May 4, 2006 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| May 4, 2006 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| May 1, 2006 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| May 1, 2006 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 21, 2006 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Apr 21, 2006 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 16, 2006 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Apr 16, 2006 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 1, 2006 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Apr 1, 2006 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 1, 2006 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 30, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |