USPTO serial 78846904
THE SMARTER WAY TO DO DINNER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3428515Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 13, 2008
- Examiner
- WILLIS, PAMELA Y
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with THE SMARTER WAY TO DO DINNER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Let's Eat Intellectual Property, Inc.
Tampa, FL
Other trademarks owned by Let's Eat Intellectual Property, Inc.
Let's Eat Intellectual Property, Inc.
Tampa, FL
Other trademarks owned by Let's Eat Intellectual Property, Inc.
Let's Eat Intellectual Property, Inc.
Tampa, FL
Other trademarks owned by Let's Eat Intellectual Property, Inc.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark I. Feldman
MARK I. FELDMAN DLA PIPER US LLPP.O. BOX 64807CHICAGO, IL 60664-0807UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Foods, namely, prepared meals consisting primarily of meats, fish, poultry and game; meat extracts; preserves, dried and cooked fruits and vegetables; jellies, jams; marmalade; fruit based spreads in the nature of raspberry sauce, cranberry sauce, mango spread, mango sauce, pumpkin pecan butter, orange sauce, apricot sauce; eggs; milk; edible oils and fats | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 28, 2006 |
| 030 | Raspberry mustard, cranberry mustard, raspberry mustard dipping sauce, cranberry mustard dipping sauce, chocolate fudge sauce, raspberry walnut dressing, mango dressing, cranberry vinaigrette, raspberry chipotle barbecue sauce, apricot ginger teriyaki sauce, spicy tuscan dipping oil, sundried tomato dipping oil, honey ginger lemongrass vinaigrette, bleu cheese pecan balsamic vinaigrette, garden herb vinaigrette, artichoke and walnut pasta sauce, artichoke parmesan bruschetta topping, six pepper salsa, sundried tomato bruschetta, tomato pinenut parmesan pasta sauce | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 28, 2006 |
| 039 | Food delivery services | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 28, 2006 |
| 043 | Personalized chef, menu planning, food preparation, food catering and meal assembly services | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 28, 2006 |
| 045 | personal grocery shopping for others | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 28, 2006 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Let's Eat Intellectual Property, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Let's Eat Intellectual Property, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Let's Eat Intellectual Property, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 039
- Other trademarks in Class 043
- Other trademarks in Class 045
- Similar marks named THE SMARTER WAY TO DO DINNER
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 19, 2014 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| May 13, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 9, 2008 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 2, 2008 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 4, 2008 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 7, 2008 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2008 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Aug 7, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 15, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 25, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 20, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 19, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 16, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 16, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 16, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 8, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 1, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 1, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 28, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 26, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 18, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 18, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 10, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 10, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 10, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 3, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |