USPTO serial 78846912
EUREKA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BIDDULPH, HEATHER ANN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EUREKA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Eden Prairie, MN
Eden Prairie, MN
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Scott W. Johnston
Scott W. Johnston MERCHANT & GOULD P.C.P.O. BOX 2910MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-0910UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 002 | Coatings for medical devices, for delivery of a wide range of pharmaceuticals, sold separately from the medical devices; coatings for dental, ocular, orthopedic, biological and surgical implants, for providing a lubricious and biocompatible surface, sold separately from the implants | ACTIVE | — |
| 005 | Drug delivery matrices consisting of compounds that facilitate delivery of a wide range of pharmaceuticals; cell and tissue delivery matrices consisting of compounds that facilitate delivery of cells and tissue to the body; naturally biodegradable matrix used as a carrier for pharmaceuticals, cells and tissue; coatings for biological implants and surgical implants comprised of living tissue, sold as an integral part of the implants, for the delivery of a wide range of pharmaceuticals; medical devices, namely, in situ tissue or bone repairer consisting of a naturally biodegradable matrix, namely, biological and surgical implants both comprised of living tissue; medical devices, namely, in situ tissue or bone filler consisting of a naturally biodegradable matrix; medical devices, namely, in situ tissue or bone repairer consisting of a naturally biodegradable matrix, namely, dental, orthopedic, and ocular implants; medical devices, namely, in situ tissue or bone repairer consisting of a naturally biodegradable matrix, namely, surgical implants comprised of artificial material | ACTIVE | — |
| 010 | Medical devices, namely, stents, orthopedic screws, orthopedic pins, and bone graft substitutes that contain and deliver a wide range of pharmaceuticals; coatings for medical devices, sold as an integral part of the medical devices, for delivery of a wide range of pharmaceuticals; coatings for dental implants, orthopedic implants, ocular implants and surgical implants comprised of artificial materials, sold as an integral part of the implants, for the delivery of a wide range of pharmaceuticals | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SurModics, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by SurModics, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 002
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Similar marks named EUREKA
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 7, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 6, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 10, 2010 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 2, 2010 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 2, 2009 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 31, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 3, 2009 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 3, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 15, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 2, 2009 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 2, 2009 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 31, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 31, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 6, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 6, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 7, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 15, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 25, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 20, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 16, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 12, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 9, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 9, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 5, 2007 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 2, 2007 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Feb 8, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 8, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 8, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 7, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 6, 2007 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jan 22, 2007 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Dec 21, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 21, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 6, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 6, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 30, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 29, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 29, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 29, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 29, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 13, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 1, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 1, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 4, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 4, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 3, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 3, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |