USPTO serial 78846917
HOOTER'S MILK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PERKINS, ELLEN J
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HOOTER'S MILK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James Michael Faier
JAMES MICHAEL FAIER FAIER & FAIER PC566 W ADAMS ST STE 600CHICAGO, IL 60661-3632UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Skin care products, namely, face creams, body lotions, cleansers, bath gels | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 26, 2009 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Mar 26, 2009 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2009 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 19, 2009 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 18, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 18, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 16, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 16, 2009 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 16, 2009 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 16, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 16, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 20, 2008 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 16, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 14, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 8, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 14, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 12, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 12, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 11, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 6, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 6, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 6, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 13, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 11, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 10, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 10, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 3, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |