USPTO serial 78847007
VERTILINC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AMOS, TANYA L
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with VERTILINC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Vertical Integration Group's VertiLinc Building Amenities Solution enables convenient access to residential building amenities, services, and information; The VertiLinc building integration platform is an automated control and information system designed for commercial buildings, condominiums, and residential neighborhoods looking to integrate administration and common services under a unified intelligent platform through a user-friendly, intuitive, graphical interface; Through this platform users can take advantage of all services offered at their facilities through internal or external service providers via a centralized console in the comfort of their office, apartment, or bedroom; The building integration platform can be a standalone product that is accessed via a web interface or via any wired/wireless panel with an Internet Browser via a secure https connection; This allows for unit residents to access all of the features available in the unit panels from their office or from anywhere in the world; Users can reserve tennis courts, order cleaning services, request concierge services, and receive instant building communications in their own personalized information dashboard; Alternatively, the building integration platform can reside inside a smart home controller; In this configuration, a complete interaction between building events and the home can be achieved; For instance, once the system recognizes that a unit owner's car has entered the parking lot or garage, the smart home controller can be set to "home" mode where the A/C turns on, entry lights are turned on an even ambiance music is set throughout the home; The Vertilinc system consists of software developed by Vertical Integrations Group as well as hardware provided by third parties that allow the software to run; The hardware in which Vertilinc may operate consists of touchscreen panels, personal digital assistants, cellular phones, computers, TV set top boxes, and others that may be added as technology evolves; The software running in the hardware will communicate with a Vertilinc server which will in turn communicate with service providers via fax, email, online printing, short message services, or a dedicated pc terminal; The terms Verti or Vertilinc have no significance in the relevant trade where Vertilinc is marketed and sold. | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 1, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 29, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 21, 2007 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 21, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 31, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 31, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 31, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 14, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 14, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 9, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 11, 2006 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Mar 30, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |