USPTO serial 78847061
SHARCOS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HAN, DAWN L
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SHARCOS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Peter M. de Jonge
ANN LAMPORT HAMMITTE LOWRIE, LANDO & ANASTASI, LLPONE MAIN STREETRIVERFRONT OFFICE PARKCAMBRIDGE, MA 02142Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Scientific apparatus and equipment, namely laboratory robots and computer peripherals therefor; robots for scientific use, robots for personal or hobby use; robots for laboratory use; electric actuators, namely sphincter seal based electric actuators, twist/bend electric actuators, electric rotary actuators; electric sphincter seal-based actuators; electric multi-seal actuators; electric band actuators; electric valve actuators; computers and computer peripherals for presenting virtual reality by simulating a visual, auditory and/or tactile environment to a human being; robot mounted cameras; computer hardware system comprised of computer monitors, audio speakers, electronic controls in the nature of foot pads and computer software, all for creating images and sounds to simulate movement by foot in settings such as combat; portable power supplies; computers and computer peripherals for presenting virtual reality by simulating and/or presenting a visual auditory and/or tactile environment to a human being; computer hardware, virtual reality computer software, and computer peripherals for use in training military personnel and civilian personnel; electric and/or electronic sensors for detecting, measuring and responding to forces and position changes by user, for causing forces applied to user and causing position changes to user for use in training military personnel and civilian personnel; computer hardware, computer peripherals, and electric or electronic sensors, all used as an interface between individual user and global or local computer network; graphical user interface software; unmanned mobile robots for personal and laboratory use; unmanned mobile robots for use in transporting and moving objects such as bombs and other hazardous devices in military and/or combat zones; unmanned mobile robots for use in surveillance and performing inspections in military and/or combat zones to ensure the safety of a designated location prior to entry by humans; micro sensing, rotary displacement electric, electronic, and electro-acoustic transducers; electronic and electric sensors for sensing and measuring displacement, force, sound, acceleration, pressure, strain, rotation and vibration; computer software for conditioning, storing and displaying signals for use with displacement sensors; wireless data transmission devices, namely transmitters and receivers that send and receive signals in the electromagnetic spectrum; antagonistic power controllers; digital robotic power controllers; digital gravity compensation software, namely computer software for computing the dynamic weight distribution of a robotic system and for computing the forces required to compensate for gravity and other forces applied to the robotic system; digital monitoring software, namely computer software for monitoring and measuring all sensor inputs and comparing the inputs against a desired value for purposes of monitoring and measuring robot self diagnosis and self assessment; robotic analog power controllers; custom load fuel cells; proximity sensors; walking robots for laboratory use; laboratory automated robots for testing suits in the field of spacesuits and chemical-biological warfare suits; computer system comprised of a computer, display screen, keyboard, touch pad, and an audio/sound generator with loud speakers for simulating visual, auditory and or tactile environments; robots in the shapes of arms, and hands and for grasping for laboratory use, personal and hobby use; plate-based covers for laboratory and personal robots; robotic figures, namely, robots in the shape of humans, animals and other animated creatures for use in marketing products for others and in other promotional settings; micro-cameras for use in inspection, surveillance and with web interfaces; robots in the shape of human and animal heads designed to move in a manner consistent with the corresponding live person or animal for entertainment use in theme park attractions, restaurants, and hotels; advance robotic systems consisting of robots for laboratory use; robots in the shape of human faces for laboratory, personal or hobby use; wearable device comprising a collection of electric or electronic sensors that track movements and measure the position and location of the person wearing the device; environmental test chamber, namely temperature simulation equipment that recreates real-world environments, nuclear environments, radioactive environments, chemical environments and biological environments; portable combustion power systems for use in converting one form of energy into other forms of energy, including electric, hydraulic, pneumatic and mechanical energy; robotic man amplifier systems, namely robotic exoskeleton devices worn by humans for the purpose of enhancing the strength and endurance of the person wearing the device; personal and individual amplification systems, namely robotic exoskeleton devices worn by persons in hazardous and dangerous environments for enhancing the endurance and strength of the person wearing the device, and providing protection from chemical, biological and nuclear threats; wearable device for measuring position of joints of humans, for lab use and research, and for tracking movements and determining body motion and position; apparatus for attachment to a person's body, namely electric and electronic sensors for use in connection with computer hardware and software, all for detecting and monitoring the physical condition of the person wearing the apparatus, for detecting and monitoring the location of the person, for detecting, monitoring and measuring variables in a person's environment and communicating physical condition, environment and location information to interested third parties; integrated low, medium and high figure control systems consisting of computer hardware, computer operating programs, and power distribution panels for use in controlling robots; micro-fluid systems consisting primarily of electric or electronic sensors for conducting on-chip chemical and other tests; custom-made reconfigurable modular themed attractions, namely automated robots in the shape of humans, animals and other animated characters for use in theme parks and the like | ACTIVE | — |
| 012 | Automatic guided unmanned ground vehicles; automatic guided unmanned ground vehicles for use in transporting and moving objects, and performing inspections and other useful tasks | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Sarcos Investments LC
- Other trademarks owned by RAYTHEON SARCOS LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Sarcos Investments LC
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Similar marks named SHARCOS
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 14, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 14, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 27, 2009 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jan 26, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 5, 2009 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 5, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 5, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 3, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 13, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 13, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 1, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 12, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 6, 2008 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Nov 20, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 31, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 15, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 8, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 15, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 14, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 14, 2007 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 14, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 13, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 2, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 2, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 2, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 2, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 2, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 2, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 26, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 30, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |