USPTO serial 78847118
SARCOS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HAN, DAWN L
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SARCOS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ann Lamport Hammitte
ANN LAMPORT HAMMITTE LOWRIE, LANDO & ANASTASI, LLPONE MAIN STREETRIVERFRONT OFFICE PARKCAMBRIDGE, MA 02142Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Medical products, namely biofeedback sensors for detecting and monitoring physical condition and medical condition of medical patient, for detecting and monitoring location of medical patient, for detecting, monitoring and measuring variables in medical patient's environment and communicating physical condition, medical condition, environment and location information and patient health information to health care professionals, family members and other interested third parties; medical apparatus for attachment to the body for measuring vital signs of a human; cardiac output sensors; pneumo-thorax sensors; micro pumps and fluid delivery systems for medical use; electro mechanical drug delivery devices, namely infusion and injection drug delivery systems for parenteral and topical administration of medications for human and veterinary applications; drug delivery systems for veterinary use; ear tag drug delivery systems; subcutaneous peritoneal access device for medical use; subcutaneous peritoneal drug delivery systems; micro-implantable drug delivery systems; multi-pathway electronically controlled drug delivery systems; prosthetic devices, namely partial and complete artificial arms, legs, hands and feet; and structural parts therefor; microcameras for medical use, namely endoscopy cameras; balloon catheters; medical guidewires; micro-catheters; side effusing catheters; thrombolytic catheters; embolic devices, namely embolic protection devices for use in vascular procedures; drug delivery products, namely drug delivery pumps; advanced robotic systems consisting of surgical robots for medical use | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by RAYTHEON SARCOS, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Sarcos Investments LC
- Other trademarks owned by Sarcos Investments LC
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Similar marks named SARCOS
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 27, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 27, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 8, 2010 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 4, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 28, 2010 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Sep 1, 2009 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 27, 2009 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 27, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 27, 2009 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jan 26, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 30, 2008 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 30, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 5, 2008 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 5, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 3, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 1, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 1, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 27, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 27, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 6, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Aug 28, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 5, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 16, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 5, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 5, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 14, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 3, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 2, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 2, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 3, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 3, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 27, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 30, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |