USPTO serial 78847128
SARCOS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HAN, DAWN L
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SARCOS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ann Lamport Hammitte
Ann Lamport Hammitte Lowrie, Lando & Anastasi, LLPRiverfront Office ParkOne Main StreetCambridge, MA 02142Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | Interactive target and gaming systems consisting of targets and aiming devices, namely, toy guns, and a scoring apparatus that keeps track of the number of targets successfully hit; interactive shooting gallery systems consisting of targets, aiming devices, namely, toy guns, scoring equipment that keeps track of the number of targets successfully hit, and special effects equipment that renders hitting a target difficult, namely, rockets, lights, and mobile robots; ball shooting implements, namely, toy guns, toy rifles and toy machine guns for use with video games; toy guns, toy rifles and toy machine guns for use with shooting galleries, arcade games, and action target skill games in which participants shoot at targets and at other participants | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by RAYTHEON SARCOS, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Sarcos Investments LC
- Other trademarks owned by Sarcos Investments LC
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Similar marks named SARCOS
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 12, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 12, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 14, 2009 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 10, 2009 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 16, 2009 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 12, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 11, 2009 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2009 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 20, 2009 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Feb 20, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 21, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 12, 2009 | PGEX | PETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2008 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Nov 3, 2008 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 3, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 27, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 27, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 11, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 11, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 6, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Sep 11, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 19, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 30, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 12, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 11, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 14, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 13, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 2, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 2, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 2, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 2, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 3, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 3, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 27, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 30, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |