USPTO serial 78847174
SQUID SYSTEMS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WILLIS, PAMELA Y
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SQUID SYSTEMS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Justin Lampel
JUSTIN LAMPEL LAMPEL & ASSOCIATES PC555 SKOKIE BLVD STE 500NORTHBROOK, IL 60062UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Broadcasting programs via a global computer network; Cable radio broadcasting; Cable radio transmission; Cable television broadcasting; Communication via fibre optical networks; Communication via radio, telegraph, telephone and television transmissions; Communications services, namely, transmitting streamed sound and audio-visual recordings via the Internet; High bit-rate data transmission services for telecommunication network operators; Information transmission via electronic communications networks; Internet cafe services, namely, providing telecommunications connections to the internet in a cafe environment; Internet telephony services; Intrastate telephone services; Network conferencing services; On-line document delivery via a global computer network; Providing a high speed access to area networks and a global computer information network; Providing access to telecommunication networks; Providing electronic transmission of credit card transaction data and electronic payment data via a global computer network; Providing multiple use access to global computer information networks for the transfer and dissemination of a wide range of information; Providing multiple user dial-up and dedicated access to the Internet; Providing multiple-user access to a global computer information network; Providing private and secure real time electronic communication over a computer network; Providing remote Internet access; Providing telecommunications connections to a global computer network; Providing telephone conferencing services; Providing voice communication services via the Internet; Rental of teleprocessing and computer communication apparatus and instruments; Streaming of audio material on the Internet; Streaming of video material on the Internet; Telecommunication services, namely, local and long distance transmission of voice, data, graphics by means of telephone, telegraphic, cable, and satellite transmissions; Telephone communication services; Telephone relay services using on-screen video; Telephone telecommunications services provided via prepaid telephone calling cards; Telephone voice messaging services; Transmission of database information via telecommunications networks; Transmission of information by electronic communications networks; Transmission of information via national and international networks; Voice over internet protocol (VOIP) services; Wireless broadband communication services; Wireless communications services, namely, transmission of graphics to mobile telephones | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 11, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 7, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 6, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 14, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 25, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 27, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 18, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 7, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 6, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 5, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 5, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 2, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 2, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 2, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 27, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 30, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |