USPTO serial 78848036
REDEEM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- YONTEF, DAVID ERIC
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with REDEEM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Latrobe, PA
Latrobe, PA
LATROBE, PA
PHOENIX INTANGIBLES HOLDING COMPANY
GREENVILLE, DE
Other trademarks owned by PHOENIX INTANGIBLES HOLDING COMPANY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David V. Radack, Esquire
David V. Radack, Esquire Eckert Seamans Cherin & Mellott, LLC600 Grant Street, 44th FloorPittsburgh, PA 15219UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | Organic and non-organic water, namely, vitamin fortified drinking water, fitness drinking, mineral and flavored water, flavored water drinks, enhanced drinking, mineral and flavored water, mineral water, spring water, sparkling water, bottled drinking water, aerated water, purified drinking water, and filtered drinking, mineral, aerated and flavored water; organic and non-organic isotonic drinks; organic and non-organic sports drinks; organic and non-organic energy sports drinks in the nature of tea; organic and non-organic lemonade; organic and non-organic fruit juices; organic and non-organic concentrates used in the preparation of soft drinks and fruit juice-based beverages; organic and non-organic fruit beverages; organic and non-organic soy-based beverages not being milk substitutes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Le-Nature's Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Le-Nature's Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by CS ACQUISITION, L.P.
- Other trademarks owned by PHOENIX INTANGIBLES HOLDING COMPANY
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Similar marks named REDEEM
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 30, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 30, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 16, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 16, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 21, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 21, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 28, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Nov 15, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 15, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 31, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Aug 28, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 5, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 16, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 7, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 7, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 15, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 15, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 15, 2007 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 13, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 12, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 12, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 20, 2006 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Sep 12, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 12, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 11, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 31, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |