USPTO serial 78848041
CODEFARM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 25, 2008
- Examiner
- DAWE III, WILLIAM H
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with CODEFARM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Brighton, East Sussex, GB
Brighton, East Sussex, GB
Brighton, East Sussex, GB
SAN FRANCISCO, VA
SAN FRANCISCO, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jonathan P. Froemel
Jonathan P. Froemel Barnes & ThornburgP.O. Box 2786Chicago, IL 60690UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computers; computer software and computer programs for financial modeling and analytics and calibrating financial models; computer software and computer programs for providing financial information; and computer software and computer programs for compiling and analyzing financial data relating to the prices of stocks, shares and investment funds analysis of financial securities | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 036 | providing financial information in the field of prices of stocks, share and investment funds; financial analysis and consultation services, namely, providing analysis and assistance with selection of financial securities including bonds, stocks, shares, investment funds and derivatives | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | computer and computer software consultation; computer programming; creating, maintaining and hosting web sites for others; rental of a database server; design and development of computer software and hardware for others; updating and maintenance of computer software for others; rental of computers, computer hardware and software; computer software installation; recovery of computer data; duplication of computer programs; design of computer systems for others and computer systems analysis | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Codefarm Software Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Codefarm Software Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Codefarm Software Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by CALYPSO TECHNOLOGY, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by CALYPSO TECHNOLOGY, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named CODEFARM
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 25, 2016 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jun 26, 2015 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Oct 19, 2011 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Feb 23, 2011 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Feb 16, 2011 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Feb 14, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 14, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 25, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 20, 2008 | DP1B | 1(B) BASIS DELETED; PROCEED TO REGISTRATION | — |
| Oct 20, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 17, 2008 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Oct 17, 2008 | D1BR | TEAS DELETE 1(B) BASIS RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 2, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 10, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 21, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 5, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 30, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 30, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 30, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 28, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 25, 2008 | CRML | CORRESPONDENCE MAILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2008 | NAUD | REPORT UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 24, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 24, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 24, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 24, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 26, 2007 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 25, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 27, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 22, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 21, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 21, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 21, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 13, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 12, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 11, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 11, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 20, 2006 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |