USPTO serial 78848106
PARAMEDIC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TWOHIG, SHANNON MARIE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 121
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PARAMEDIC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Jonquière, Quebec, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARK HARRISON
MARK HARRISON VENABLE LLPPO BOX 34385WASHINGTON, DC 20043-4385UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Medical supplies, namely, compresses, abdominal cushions, eye patches, gloves, bandages, bandage covers, adhesive ribbons and bandages, antiseptic pads, stitches, first aid kits, first aid waist kits, medical bags for home use, medical bags, bags for technicians, medical back packs, briefcases, writing boards, first aid manuals; anti-allergenic beddings, namely, pillow and mattress covers; medical instruments, namely, scissors, reflex hammers, pincers and seizers; disinfectant soaps, creams and gels, isopropyl alcohol, tampons, facial masks, finger obturators, cervical necklaces, epicondylitis supports, adjustable arm supports, elastic supports, finger immobilisers, reusable quilts, disposable quilts, protective creams, stethoscopes, draining valves, inflation pumps, cushions, hand extensions, stocking aids, shoe hoods, long handle brushes, reusable bibs, intensive care masks, retail sales of parapharmaceutical products excluding all pharmaceutical or medical preparations | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 27, 2010 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 27, 2010 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 29, 2010 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 28, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 28, 2009 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 27, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 10, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 10, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 6, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 12, 2009 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 11, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 10, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 10, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 10, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 3, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 4, 2008 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 3, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 5, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 5, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 1, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 19, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 19, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 16, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 16, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 19, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 18, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 11, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 3, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |