CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for VBT LOCK VIRTUAL BOX TERMINAL

USPTO serial 78848573

VBT LOCK VIRTUAL BOX TERMINAL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LAWRENCE, SUSAN KASTRINER
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VBT LOCK VIRTUAL BOX TERMINAL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Dora M. Penagaricano

DORA M PENAGARICANO; MCCONNELL VALDES SAN JUAN00918 9TH FL 270 MUNOZ RIVERA AVEPRX, PRUNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Mail sorting, handling and receivingACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 27, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 27, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 23, 2008NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 1, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 11, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 28, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 27, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 3, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
May 3, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 3, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 3, 2008PGRRPETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED—
Apr 25, 2008PETLCOMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER—
Apr 25, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 25, 2008PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
Dec 27, 2007APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Dec 18, 2007PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Dec 18, 2007FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Nov 2, 2007MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 2, 2007ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 6, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 6, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 20, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 19, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 19, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 18, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 18, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 12, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 4, 2006MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Apr 3, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance