USPTO serial 78849416
ZAK!
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 13, 2007
- Examiner
- ZAK, HENRY
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with ZAK!?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $1,097*
Plus Government fees of $1,950
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Shamus T. O'Doherty
Shamus T. O'Doherty RANDALL | DANSKIN PS601 W. 1st Ave.SUITE 800SPOKANE, WA 99201Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | FLATWARE, NAMELY, FORKS; SPOONS; KNIVES; SPORKS, NAMELY, SPOON/FORK COMBINATIONS; KNIFE-LIKE SPREADERS | ACTIVE | Aug 1, 2005 |
| 020 | Drinking Straws | ACTIVE | Aug 21, 2005 |
| 021 | DINNERWARE, NAMELY, PLATES; BOWLS; TRAYS; MIXING BOWLS; BATTER BOWLS; KITCHEN PREP BOWLS; COLANDERS; SPOON RESTS; SERVING WARE, NAMELY, TRAYS, BOWLS, SALAD BOWLS, SALAD SERVERS, PARTY PLATTERS, AND CHIP AND DIP TRAYS; CONDIMENT BOWLS; RELISH TRAYS; SALT AND PEPPER CELLARS; DINNERWARE ACCESSORY ITEMS, NAMELY, APPETIZER PICKS, EGG CUPS, APPETIZER PLATES, SHOT GLASSES, STIR STICKS, SALT AND PEPPER SHAKERS, NON-SKID TRAY MATS, NON-PAPER AND NON-LINEN COASTERS, HOT AND COLD FOOD STORAGE CONTAINERS MADE OF PLASTIC, STAINLESS STEEL, CERAMIC, EARTHENWARE, PORCELAIN, AND BONE CHINA; KITCHEN UTENSILS NAMELY SERVING SPOONS, SCOOPS, SPATULAS, PASTA SERVERS, LADLES, SKIMMERS, PANCAKE TURNERS, REAMERS FOR FRUIT JUICE, SLOTTED SPOONS, GARLIC PEELERS, AND CUTTING BOARDS ALL MADE FROM PLASTIC OR STAINLESS STEEL; DRINKWARE, NAMELY, MUGS, TUMBLERS, PITCHERS, CUPS, CANTEENS, SPILL PROOF CUPS, COFFEE TUMBLERS, SPORTS BOTTLES SOLD EMPTY, ALL MADE OF ALUMINUM, STAINLESS STEEL, PLASTIC, GLASS, CERAMIC, EARTHENWARE, PORCELAIN, OR BONE CHINA; HARD-SIDED AND SOFT-SIDED LUNCH BOXES MADE FROM PLASTIC, NYLON, AND OTHER NATURAL AND/OR SYNTHETIC FIBERS; CHOPSTICKS MADE FROM STAINLESS STEEL, PLASTIC, POTTERY, CERAMIC, PORCELAIN, OR BONE CHINA | ACTIVE | Aug 1, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Zak Designs, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Zak Designs, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Zak Designs, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 008
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Similar marks named ZAK!
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 4, 2024 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 4, 2024 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 4, 2024 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 1, 2017 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 1, 2017 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Dec 1, 2017 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Dec 1, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 3, 2017 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 21, 2017 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE - POWER OF ATTORNEY ENTERED | — |
| Jun 16, 2017 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Apr 17, 2017 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 17, 2017 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 13, 2016 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 12, 2013 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 12, 2013 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Sep 12, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 29, 2013 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2013 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 5, 2011 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE - POWER OF ATTORNEY NOT ENTERED | — |
| May 6, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 13, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 28, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 8, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 20, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 18, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 18, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 18, 2007 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2007 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 18, 2007 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jul 16, 2007 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Jul 2, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 29, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 29, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 29, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 25, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 6, 2007 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Mar 6, 2007 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Mar 6, 2007 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Feb 23, 2007 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Feb 6, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 5, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 2, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 1, 2007 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 1, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 1, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 1, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 5, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 19, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 19, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 12, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 4, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |