USPTO serial 78849461
OLD CREEK RANCH WINERY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 1, 2007
- Examiner
- STEEL, ALYSSA PALADINO
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with OLD CREEK RANCH WINERY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Carmel Whitman Living Trust, comprising Carmel M. Whitman and John G. Whitman, both U.S. Citizens
Ventura, CA
Carmel Whitman Living Trust, comprising Carmel M. Whitman and John G. Whitman, both U.S. Citizens
Ventura, CA
Carmel Whitman Living Trust, comprising Carmel M. Whitman and John G. Whitman, both U.S. Citizens
Ventura, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jonathan Feldman
Carmel Whitman Living Trust, comprisingCarmel M. W1003 Woodstock LaneVentura, CA 93001UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 033 | Wine | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 29, 2006 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Carmel Whitman Living Trust, comprising Carmel M. Whitman and John G. Whitman, both U.S. Citizens
- Other trademarks owned by Carmel Whitman Living Trust, comprising Carmel M. Whitman and John G. Whitman, both U.S. Citizens
- Other trademarks owned by Carmel Whitman Living Trust, comprising Carmel M. Whitman and John G. Whitman, both U.S. Citizens
- Other trademarks in Class 033
- Similar marks named OLD CREEK RANCH WINERY
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 8, 2017 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| May 1, 2016 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| May 30, 2012 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 30, 2012 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| May 30, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 18, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 18, 2012 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| May 1, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 13, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 24, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 21, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 21, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 6, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 20, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 20, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 17, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 16, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 16, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 20, 2006 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Sep 20, 2006 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Sep 20, 2006 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 19, 2006 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 12, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 23, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 23, 2006 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| May 8, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 1, 2006 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 29, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 29, 2006 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 5, 2006 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |