Drawing for MOTO JEANS

USPTO serial 78849516

MOTO JEANS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HERMAN, RUSS
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MOTO JEANS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Frank P. Presta

FRANK P PRESTA NIXON & VANDERHYE901 N GLEBE RD FL 11ARLINGTON, VA 22203-1853UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009EYEGLASSES, SUNGLASSES, SPORT GLASSESACTIVE—
014WATCHES, JEWELRYACTIVE—
018BAGS OF VARIOUS SHAPES AND SIZES, NAMELY-- ALL PURPOSE SPORTS BAGS, ATHLETIC BAGS, GYM BAGS, HAND BAGS, SHOULDER BAGS, BACKPACKS, SCHOOL BAGS, FABRIC LUGGAGE BAGS, FANNY PACKS, WRIST MOUNTED CARRYALL BAGS, LUGGAGE, TRAVELLING BAGS, SUITCASES, TRUNKS, DUFFEL BAGSACTIVE—
025PANTS AND SHORTS, SKIRTS, JACKETS, DRESSES, AND BLAZERS; SWEATERS, T-SHIRTS, CAMISOLES, JUMPSUITS, BLOUSES, SHIRTS, JERSEYS, FLEECE-LINED SWEATSHIRTS, COATS, SLIPOVERS, POLO SHIRTS, BELTSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 14, 2007MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Dec 14, 2007ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Dec 13, 2007LOAPLETTER OF ABANDONMENT PROCESSED—
Dec 10, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 9, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 9, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 23, 2007RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
May 23, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 17, 2006GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 17, 2006CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Nov 15, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Oct 26, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 26, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 15, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 15, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 15, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 4, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance