Drawing for HISREACH

USPTO serial 78849598

HISREACH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MEIER, SHARON A
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HISREACH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Patrick E. Guevara

PATRICK E GUEVARA MCNICHOLS RANDICK O'DEA & TOOLIATOS LLP5000 HOPYARD ROADSTE 400PLEASANTON, CA 94588-3148

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
038Audio broadcasting; Audio teleconferencing; Communications services, namely, transmitting streamed sound and audio-visual recordings via the Internet; Providing on-line chat rooms and electronic bulletin boards for transmission of messages among users in the field of general interest; Providing on-line chat rooms for transmission of messages among computer users concerning spirituality, religion, music, art, society, and literature; Providing on-line communications links which transfer the website user to other local and global web pages; Providing on-line electronic bulletin boards for transmission of messages among computer users concerning spirituality, religion, music, art, society, and literature; Providing on-line forums for transmission of messages among computer users concerning spirituality, religion, music, art, society, and literature; Providing on-line listservers for transmission of messages among computer users concerning spirituality, religion, music, art, society, and literature; Streaming of audio material on the Internet; Streaming of video material on the Internet; Transmission of sound and vision via satellite or interactive multimedia networks; Transmission of sound, picture and data signals; Transmission of sound, video and information; Video teleconferencing; Virtual chatrooms established via text messaging; Voice chat services; Web conferencing services; Web messaging; Web site forwarding servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 15, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 15, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 13, 2010NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 20, 2010NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 19, 2010NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jan 19, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 14, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 9, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 10, 2009RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
May 8, 2009RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Nov 8, 2008RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
May 8, 2008RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Nov 8, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
May 8, 2007GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 8, 2007CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Apr 18, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 18, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 18, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 15, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 15, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 15, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 11, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 11, 2006MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Apr 4, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance