USPTO serial 78849745
CADDY 1000
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ROBERTSON, DEIRDRE G
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CADDY 1000?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Meredith K. Lowry
Meredith K. Lowry Keisling & Pieper PLCP.O. Box 10379Fayetteville, AR 72703UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | POWER-OPERATED SPRAYER SYSTEMS | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 14, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 7, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 12, 2007 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 12, 2007 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 12, 2007 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 1, 2007 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 8, 2007 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 21, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 1, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 28, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 22, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 14, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 13, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 13, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 13, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 13, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 4, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |