USPTO serial 78850310
OMANY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SERVANCE, RENEE L
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with OMANY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael D. Schumann
HAMRE, SCHUMANN, MUELLER & LARSON PC225 S 6TH ST STE 2650MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-4656UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Chinese traditional ready-made medicines for the treatment of cancer, cardiovascular and cerebral disease, heart disease, gynecopathy, diabetes and diabetes mellitus; medicines for human purposes for the treatment of cancer, cardiovascular and cerebral disease, heart disease, gynecopathy, diabetes and diabetes mellitus; diet, allergy and decongestant capsules for medicines; dietetic substances, namely dietary supplements, dietary drink mix for use as a meal replacement, dietetic foods adapted for medicinal use; depuratives, namely, colon cleansers, medical preparations for removing impurities from blood, depuratives in the nature of disinfectants for use in purifying air and sterilizing waste; medicines for veterinary purposes, namely diagnostic preparations, baceteriostats; pesticides; cotton for medical purposes; preparations to facilitate teething, namely, material for stopping teeth, material for repairing teeth and for dental crowns and bridges; non-medical nutrition diet capsules, non-medical nutrition gelatin capsules sold empty for pharmaceuticals; non-medical nutrition liquid, namely, nutritional drink mix for use as a meal replacement, nutritional oils not for cosmetic purposes, nutritional shakes for use as a meal substitute; non-medical nutrition powder, namely, nutritional supplements, powdered nutritional supplemental drink mix | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | tea; preserved blue-green algae, also known as spirulinas, as non-medical nutrients; tea based beverage; prepared coffee based beverage containing milk; non-medical nutrition capsules, liquid and powder mainly containing substances extracted for a herb known as Ganoderma Lucidum; iced tea; camellia oilseed flour; green tea flavored noodles | ACTIVE | — |
| 044 | medical clinics; health care; medical assistance; physical therapy; nursing care; pharmaceutical advice; services of a psychologist, namely, psychological testing, psychological consultation; convalescent homes; nutritional consulting for eating and drinking; massage | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 1, 2010 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 31, 2010 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 27, 2009 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2009 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 24, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 17, 2009 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 3, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 3, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 2, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 20, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 12, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 12, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 16, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 7, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 15, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 15, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 15, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 13, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 13, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 12, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 4, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |