USPTO serial 78850389
HUE PLACE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ROSSMAN, WILLIAM M
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with HUE PLACE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard Y. Kim
RICHARD Y. KIM MCDERMOTT WILL & EMERY LLP600 13TH ST NW STE 1200WASHINGTON, DC 20005-3096UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Demonstration of products; demonstration of goods and services by electronic means, also for the benefit of the so-called teleshopping and homeshopping services; market research services; advertising and promotion services and related consulting; dissemination of advertisements and of advertising material, namely, flyers, brochures, leaflets and samples; corporate management assistance; business information services; retail store services in the field of soaps; wholesale stores featuring soap; soap procurement services for others; retail store services in the field of detergents; wholesale stores featuring detergent; detergent procurement services for others; retail store services in the field of cosmetics; wholesale stores featuring cosmetics; cosmetic procurement services for others; retail store services in the field of health food supplements; wholesale stores featuring health food supplements; health food supplements procurement services for others; cost analyses; consumer research namely, research of women's propensity to cosmetics, research into customer's buying habits and needs for cosmetics, research of consumer's satisfaction with cosmetics and research of consumer's behavior on cosmetic trends; market research, namely market trends in the field of cosmetics; management of retail store services for others in the field of cosmetics and beauty care products; management of wholesale stores for others featuring cosmetics and beauty care products; and provision of data, namely, conducting business research and business data analysis | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 5, 2008 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Feb 5, 2008 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Feb 5, 2008 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 1, 2007 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 31, 2007 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 15, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 25, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 15, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 15, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 11, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 11, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 6, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 6, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 6, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 14, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 19, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 18, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 12, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 4, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |