Drawing for W WONDERCOOKER. THERE'S A MILLION MEALS INSIDE!

USPTO serial 78850450

W WONDERCOOKER. THERE'S A MILLION MEALS INSIDE!

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LE, KHANH M
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with W WONDERCOOKER. THERE'S A MILLION MEALS INSIDE!?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kathy Mojibi

Kathy Mojibi Sylmark, Inc.7821 Orion Avenue, Suite 200Lake Balboa, CA 91406UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011Electric grills.ACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 29, 2008MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Oct 29, 2008ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Oct 29, 2008EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Aug 14, 2008EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Apr 17, 2008GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 17, 2008GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 17, 2008CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Feb 28, 2008JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jan 21, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 2, 2007GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Nov 2, 2007GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Nov 2, 2007CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Oct 6, 2007JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Sep 12, 2007JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jul 6, 2007EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jul 6, 2007EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jul 5, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 5, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 5, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 9, 2007GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 9, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 20, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 20, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 20, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 21, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 23, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 23, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 23, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 5, 2006MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Apr 4, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance